Recommend StackExchange Architecture Updates - Running Smoothly, Amazon 4x More Expensive (Email)

This action will generate an email recommending this article to the recipient of your choice. Note that your email address and your recipient's email address are not logged by this system.

EmailEmail Article Link

The email sent will contain a link to this article, the article title, and an article excerpt (if available). For security reasons, your IP address will also be included in the sent email.

Article Excerpt:

We've had a few articles on the StackOverlflow Architecture and Stack Overflow Architecture Update - Now at 95 Million Page Views a Month. Time for another update. This time from a podcast. Every week or so Jeff, Joel and guests sit around and converse. The result is a podcast. In a recent podcast they talked about some of their recent architecture issues, problems, and updates. And since I wrote this article before my vacation, they've also published a new architecture update article: The Stack Exchange Architecture – 2011 Edition, Episode 1.

My overall impression is they are in a comfortable place, adding new sites, adding new features, making a house a home.

Notable for their scale-up architecture, you might expect with their growth that they would slam into a wall. Not so. They've been able to scale-up the power of individual servers by adding more CPU and RAM. SSD has been added in some cases. Even their flagship StackOverflow product runs on a single server. New machines have been bought, but very few.

So, the StackOverflow experiment shows the scale-up strategy for even largish sites is a good practice.  True, their product naturally separates by topic, much like the early Facebook, but Moore's law and quality engineering are your friends. They estimate Amazon would cost them 4 times much.

Here's what StackExchange has been up to:


Article Link:
Your Name:
Your Email:
Recipient Email:
Message: